US has enough to take over and put down revolts ever on end the main reason being russia gets alot of wheat from the us and europe and chances are europe will probably help the usa making it even more of a landslide i think the nuclear weapons are just dust collectors now who would want to destroy the whole world? -their would be more than 1 nuclear launches if russia lauched-

the USA has the capability to spook its people with news that Putin wants to star WW3, has more nukes and has a better fighter jet. guess what? the Russian jet has been superior for about 2 decades. (i think) many years anyway. this is not news, just agitation to push the Pentagon a higher budget, get General Dynamics some federal welfare, build bombs and make the people THINK it is money well spent. no one is ever going to fight a nuclear war with hopes of winning. 10 bombs on each side is enough to poison the world.

"the sky is falling" works every time...

I read everyday that USA (or NATO, thought this is the same) upgrating their military non-nuclear capabilities. So, what need to? To weep about in the Internet? Or come out the window? ... like their military capabilities have to do with me :-/

ANd i don't any readons to ask about USA's nuclear weapon in Russian section. You need door at the other end of the hallway.

Both sides have the capability to destroy each other. Let's hope that it is only posturing.

in 2010 its capabilities were 48 however this year it has improved to capability 4.7 (EFG)

Enough to defend itself.

Where is your source of your "informed" comments? Your imagination? Ukraine fake government officials? NATO? No country is superior to the U.S. in deadly force and destructive ability.

People, investigate and analyze, and dont fall for this garbage. The U.S. is the aggressor and provocateur toward Russia for no apparent reason other than U.S. grab for Ukraine resources.